In recent years the field of longevity has exploded, with scientists making significant breakthroughs in understanding how we can live longer, healthier lives.
As these scientists continue to uncover how and why we age, their research suggests that aging may actually be a somewhat modifiable process. Science-backed interventions show promise in slowing down the aging process and increasing lifespan. According to these experts, aging may not be inevitable.
Aging is a gradual decrease in function due to the accumulation of cellular damage. [1] More broadly, aging is the culmination of the physiological changes that occur over our lifespans. While some of these changes are seemingly harmless (like graying hair and wrinkles) others have a more profound impact—affecting aspects of health like mobility, bone strength, and disease susceptibility.
Aging is a complex, non-linear process that is considered to begin in the fourth decade of life, between the ages of 30-39 years. [2] However, each person ages at a unique rate. Some people maintain their mental capacity and stamina well into their later years, whereas others begin exhibiting signs of aging as early as their mid-20s. [3,4] While genetics and biology play a key role, the rate of aging is also significantly impacted by behavioral and psychological factors including diet, physical activity, smoking status, stress levels, sleep patterns, and social connections. [5-8]
Initially, aging was believed to be an evolutionary benefit to the human species—aging and eventual death prevented overcrowding and allowed for the survival of beneficial genetic traits. [7] But, advances in research have made it clear that this complex, multifaceted process cannot be attributed to a singular cause. Rather the more widely accepted explanation is that aging is the result of multiple genetic, biological, and environmental processes combining, interacting, and overlapping with each other on a variety of levels.[7,9]
Given the inherent complexities of aging, scientists have theorized for years about the exact mechanisms behind the process as they seek to understand the cause, effect, and what keeps it at bay. At one point, over 300 different theories attempted to explain the phenomenon. [7,9]
Advances in research geared towards unraveling the process have led to two prevailing categories of aging: programmed theories of aging and damage theories of aging.
Programmed theories center around the notion that aging is an innate part of biology. Cells are programmed to decay and deliberately deteriorate in function over time. In other words, cells have a finite lifespan. [7,9,10]
Damage theories of aging view aging not as inherent, but rather, as an accumulation of damage caused by environmental factors. According to this theory, wear and tear are the main drivers of aging. [7,9,10]
As research evolves, aging experts are reframing the aging process. Rather than just a set of innate biological processes that result in irreversible molecular and cellular changes, aging is a complex interaction between genetics and lifestyle. Though you can't fully prevent all aging processes from occurring, research shows that individuals have the power to extend their lifespan by altering key lifestyle aspects like diet, exercise, stress, and sleep. [12-14]
While longevity may be the ultimate goal, these interventions not only focus on extending lifespan but extending healthspan—the number of years we live in good health—as well.
References
[1] Understanding the dynamics of the aging process. National Institute of Health. Accessed August 8, 2022.
[2] Dziechciaż M, Filip R. Biological psychological and social determinants of old age: bio-psycho-social aspects of human aging. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2014;21(4):835-838.
[3] Aging and Health. The World Health Organization. Accessed August 8, 2022.
[4] Melzer D, Pilling LC, Ferrucci L. The genetics of human ageing. Nat Rev Genet. 2020;21(2):88-101.
[5] Crimmins EM. Social hallmarks of aging: Suggestions for geroscience research. Ageing Res Rev. 2020;63:101136.
[6] Passarino G, De Rango F, Montesanto A. Human longevity: Genetics or Lifestyle? It takes two to tango. Immun Ageing. 2016;13:12. Published 2016 Apr 5.
[7] Kirkwood TB. Understanding the odd science of aging. Cell. 2005;120(4):437-447.
[8] DiLoreto R, Murphy CT. The cell biology of aging. Mol Biol Cell. 2015;26(25):4524-4531.
[9] da Costa JP, Vitorino R, Silva GM, Vogel C, Duarte AC, Rocha-Santos T. A synopsis on aging-Theories, mechanisms and future prospects. Ageing Res Rev. 2016;29:90-112.
[10] Jin K. Modern Biological Theories of Aging. Aging Dis. 2010;1(2):72-74.
[11]. Sinclair, David. Lifespan: why we age and why we don’t have to. Atria Books; 2019.
[12] Muscat SM, Barrientos RM. Lifestyle modifications with anti-neuroinflammatory benefits in the aging population. Exp Gerontol. 2020;142:111144.
[13] Peskind ER, Li G, Shofer JB, et al. Influence of lifestyle modifications on age-related free radical injury to brain. JAMA Neurol. 2014;71(9):1150-1154.
[14] Mamalaki E, Charisis S, Anastasiou CA, et al. The Longitudinal Association of Lifestyle with Cognitive Health and Dementia Risk: Findings from the HELIAD Study. Nutrients. 2022;14(14):2818. Published 2022 Jul 8.
[15] Giacoppo S, Galuppo M, Montaut S, et al. An overview on neuroprotective effects of isothiocyanates for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. Fitoterapia. 2015;106:12-21.
[16] [17]Virtanen HEK, Voutilainen S, Koskinen TT, et al. Dietary proteins and protein sources and risk of death: the Kuopio Ischaemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019;109(5):1462-1471.
[18] Alshahrani SM, Fraser GE, Sabaté J, et al. Red and Processed Meat and Mortality in a Low Meat Intake Population. Nutrients. 2019;11(3):622. Published 2019 Mar 14.
[19] Saad R. Effects of Intermittent Fasting on Health, Aging, and Disease. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(18):1773.
[20] Okely JA, Weiss A, Gale CR. The interaction between stress and positive affect in predicting mortality. J Psychosom Res. 2017;100:53-60.